Network Inference and Graph Neural Networks

Written By Kamayani Gupta

Understanding biological systems often requires viewing them not as isolated entities but as interconnected networks. These networks may represent protein–protein interactions, gene regulatory relationships, metabolic pathways, or broader system-level interactions derived from multi-omics data. Network inference refers to the process of deducing these relationships from high-dimensional biological data, and AI, particularly graph-based learning methods, has dramatically expanded what is possible in this field.

At the heart of network inference is the idea that biological phenomena are governed by structured dependencies that can be modeled as graphs. Traditional methods, such as correlation-based approaches, Bayesian networks, and mutual information-based algorithms like ARACNE (Algorithm for the Reconstruction of Accurate Cellular Networks), have long been used to reconstruct gene regulatory or protein interaction networks from expression data (Margolin et al., 2006). While effective, these techniques often assume linearity or independence conditions that are rarely satisfied in biological contexts. Additionally, they may struggle with scale and the noise inherent in omics data.

AI models, particularly Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), have introduced a more flexible, data-driven approach to learning network structures and dynamics. GNNs are deep learning architectures designed to operate directly on graphs. Instead of learning patterns in vectorized data matrices, GNNs learn node representations by aggregating features from neighboring nodes over multiple layers, preserving the topology of biological systems (Zitnik et al., 2018).

Applications of GNNs in computational biology have grown rapidly. For instance, GNNs have been used for protein–protein interaction prediction (Fout et al., 2017), drug–target interaction modeling (Torng and Altman, 2019), and cancer subtype classification based on pathway-structured omics data (Rhee et al., 2018). These methods are often trained in a supervised fashion, where the model learns to classify or predict node or edge attributes, or in unsupervised or self-supervised paradigms where the goal is to encode meaningful embeddings for downstream tasks.

One of the key advantages of GNNs is their ability to handle heterogeneity in biological data. For example, heterogeneous graph neural networks can incorporate different types of nodes and edges, enabling the integration of various omics layers or experimental conditions into a unified framework (Wang et al., 2020). Dynamic GNNs, meanwhile, model how networks evolve over time — a valuable feature for studying developmental processes, disease progression, or treatment response.

Despite their promise, GNNs are not without challenges. Biological networks are often incomplete, noisy, and biased toward well-studied genes or pathways. Model interpretability remains a significant hurdle, particularly in clinical contexts where trust and explainability are essential. Furthermore, training GNNs at scale can be computationally expensive and sensitive to hyperparameter tuning.

Still, as tools and methods evolve, graph-based AI is poised to become a foundational element of computational biology. Researchers are now exploring hybrid methods that combine mechanistic models with learned graph representations, and benchmarks are emerging to evaluate GNN performance on biological tasks (Dwivedi et al., 2020).

Ultimately, network inference empowered by GNNs represents a convergence of systems biology and machine learning. For computational biologists, this area offers both a rich conceptual framework and a practical set of tools for modeling the complexity of life.

References

Kamayani Gupta
Previous

Multi-Omics Data Integration using AI
Next

Explainability, Interpretability, and Reproducibility in AI Models